Validatie: elecdebate60to16
Cumulatief 50 van 318 sprekersbeurten gescoord, model qwen/qwen3.6-27b(0 extractiefouten, 0 tagfouten totaal). Laatst bijgewerkt: 12 aug 2026, 11:04. Elke make validate-run scoort de eerstvolgende, nog niet gescoorde beurten en telt op bij deze cijfers. Zie docs/eval-elecdebate.md in de repository voor de volledige methodologie.
Argumentherkenning
Vindt onze extractie dezelfde tekstspannen als de dataset (standpunt + onderbouwing)?
- Precision
- 36%
- Recall
- 61%
- F1
- 45%
Per teken van het citaat vergeleken, niet per heel argument: zo telt een net iets andere zinsgrens (politieke transcripten lopen niet exact gelijk met de dataset-labels) als gedeeltelijke overlap in plaats van een volledige misser. 11208 overlappende, 20290 te veel, 7266 gemiste tekens; dit zijn dus geen argumenttellingen.
Drogreden-tags
Kent onze tagprompt de juiste drogreden toe op de referentiecitaten van de dataset?
- Precision
- 79%
- Recall
- 48%
- F1
- 60%
15 correct, 4 onterecht, 16 gemist, per drogreden-citaat geteld.
Argumentherkenning: voorbeelden
Verwacht/voorspeld staat er alleen bij als dit argument overlapt met een referentie-drogreden-citaat (zie "Drogreden-tags" hieronder) -- de meeste argumenten zijn geen drogreden en tonen dus geen tags.
Gevonden (90)
Our jobs are fleeing the country. They’re going to Mexico. They’re going to many other countries. You look at what China is doing to our country in terms of making our product
we have a very good fight. And we have a winning fight
we have to stop our jobs from being stolen from us. We have to stop our companies from leaving the United States and, with it, firing all of their people. All you have to do is take a look at Carrier air conditioning in Indianapolis
we have to stop our jobs from being stolen from us. We have to stop our companies from leaving the United States and, with it, firing all of their people. All you have to do is take a look at Carrier air conditioning in Indianapolis. They left—fired 1,400 people. They’re going to Mexico. So many hundreds and hundreds of companies are doing this
We cannot let it happen. Under my plan, I’ll be reducing taxes tremendously, from 35 percent to 15 percent for companies, small and big businesses. That’s going to be a job creator like we haven’t seen since Ronald Reagan. It’s going to be a beautiful thing to watch. Companies will come. They will build. They will expand. New companies will start. And I look very, very much forward to doing it. We have to renegotiate our trade deals
We have to renegotiate our trade deals, and we have to stop these countries from stealing our companies and our jobs
the kind of plan that Donald has put forth would be trickle-down economics all over again. In fact, it would be the most extreme version
the kind of plan that Donald has put forth would be trickle-down economics all over again. In fact, it would be the most extreme version, the biggest tax cuts for the top percent of the people in this country than we’ve ever had. I call it trumped-up trickle-down, because that’s exactly what it would be. That is not how we grow the economy
So we have to do that. We have to renegotiate our trade deals
The companies are leaving. I could name, I mean, there are thousands of them
our politicians never do this, because they have special interests
they have special interests and the special interests want those companies to leave
the special interests want those companies to leave, because in many cases, they own the companies
we can stop them from leaving. We have to stop them from leaving
I intend to get it done, we will have 10 million more new jobs
we will have 10 million more new jobs, because we will be making investments where we can grow the economy.
That was a disaster. They lost plenty of money on that one
Our energy policies are a disaster. Our country is losing so much in terms of energy, in terms of paying off our debt
When I was secretary of state, we actually increased American exports globally 30 percent. We increased them to China 50 percent. So I know how to really work to get new jobs and to get exports that helped to create more new jobs
NAFTA is the worst trade deal maybe ever signed anywhere, but certainly ever signed in this country. And now you want to approve Trans-Pacific Partnership. You were totally in favor of it. Then you heard what I was saying, how bad it is, and you said, I can’t win that debate. But you know that if you did win, you would approve that, and that will be almost as bad as NAFTA. Nothing will ever top NAFTA
now you want to approve Trans-Pacific Partnership. You were totally in favor of it
now you want to approve Trans-Pacific Partnership. You were totally in favor of it. Then you heard what I was saying, how bad it is, and you said, I can’t win that debate. But you know that if you did win, you would approve that, and that will be almost as bad as NAFTA
we need to have strong growth, fair growth, sustained growth. We also have to look at how we help families balance the responsibilities at home and the responsibilities at business. So we have a very robust set of plans
We also have to look at how we help families balance the responsibilities at home and the responsibilities at business. So we have a very robust set of plans
we have a very robust set of plans. And people have looked at both of our plans, have concluded that mine would create 10 million jobs and yours would lose us 3.5 million jobs, and explode the debt which would have a recession
Your regulations are a disaster, and you’re going to increase regulations all over the place. And by the way, my tax cut is the biggest since Ronald Reagan. I’m very proud of it. It will create tremendous numbers of new jobs. But regulations, you are going to regulate these businesses out of existence
Your regulations are a disaster, and you’re going to increase regulations all over the place. And by the way, my tax cut is the biggest since Ronald Reagan. I’m very proud of it. It will create tremendous numbers of new jobs. But regulations, you are going to regulate these businesses out of existence. When I go around—Lester, I tell you this, I’ve been all over. And when I go around, despite the tax cut, the thing—the things that business as in people like the most is the fact that I’m cutting regulation. You have regulations on top of regulations, and new companies cannot form and old companies are going out of business. And you want to increase the regulations and make them even worse
you are going to regulate these businesses out of existence. When I go around—Lester, I tell you this, I’ve been all over. And when I go around, despite the tax cut, the thing—the things that business as in people like the most is the fact that I’m cutting regulation. You have regulations on top of regulations, and new companies cannot form and old companies are going out of business
What I have proposed would cut regulations and streamline them for small businesses. What I have proposed would be paid for by raising taxes on the wealthy
What I have proposed would be paid for by raising taxes on the wealthy, because they have made all the gains in the economy
we have no leadership. And honestly, that starts with Secretary Clinton
Trickle-down did not work. It got us into the mess we were in, in 2008 and 2009
building the middle class, investing in the middle class, making college debt-free so more young people can get their education, helping people refinance their—their debt from college at a lower rate. Those are the kinds of things that will really boost the economy
investing in the middle class, making college debt-free so more young people can get their education, helping people refinance their—their debt from college at a lower rate. Those are the kinds of things that will really boost the economy
making college debt-free so more young people can get their education, helping people refinance their—their debt from college at a lower rate. Those are the kinds of things that will really boost the economy
helping people refinance their—their debt from college at a lower rate. Those are the kinds of things that will really boost the economy
Our country has tremendous problems. We’re a debtor nation. We’re a serious debtor nation. And we have a country that needs new roads, new tunnels, new bridges, new airports, new schools, new hospitals
The Trump International is way under budget and way ahead of schedule. And we should be able to do that for our country
Race remains a significant challenge in our country. Unfortunately, race still determines too much
Unfortunately, race still determines too much, often determines where people live
Unfortunately, race still determines too much, often determines where people live, determines what kind of education in their public schools they can get
We have to restore trust between communities and the police. We have to work to make sure that our police are using the best training, the best techniques, that they’re well prepared to use force only when necessary. Everyone should be respected by the law, and everyone should respect the law. Right now, that’s not the case in a lot of our neighborhoods. So I have, ever since the first day of my campaign, called for criminal justice reform. I’ve laid out a platform that I think would begin to remedy some of the problems we have in the criminal justice system. But we also have to recognize, in addition to the challenges that we face with policing, there are so many good, brave police officers who equally want reform. So we have to bring communities together in order to begin working on that as a mutual goal. And we’ve got to get guns out of the hands of people who should not have them. The gun epidemic is the leading cause of death of young African- American men, more than the next nine causes put together. So we have to do two things, as I said
Everyone should be respected by the law, and everyone should respect the law. Right now, that’s not the case in a lot of our neighborhoods. So I have, ever since the first day of my campaign, called for criminal justice reform
Thousands of shootings. And I’m saying, where is this? Is this a war-torn country? What are we doing? And we have to stop the violence
we have to stop the violence. We have to bring back law and order
We have to bring back law and order. In a place like Chicago, where thousands of people have been killed, thousands over the last number of years, in fact, almost 4,000 have been killed since Barack Obama became president, over—almost 4,000 people in Chicago have been killed
We have to bring back law and order. In a place like Chicago, where thousands of people have been killed, thousands over the last number of years, in fact, almost 4,000 have been killed since Barack Obama became president, over—almost 4,000 people in Chicago have been killed. We have to bring back law and order. Now, whether or not in a place like Chicago you do stop and frisk, which worked very well, Mayor Giuliani is here, worked very well in New York. It brought the crime rate way down. But you take the gun away from criminals that shouldn’t be having it. We have gangs roaming the street. And in many cases, they’re illegally here, illegal immigrants. And they have guns
We have to bring back law and order. In a place like Chicago, where thousands of people have been killed, thousands over the last number of years, in fact, almost 4,000 have been killed since Barack Obama became president, over—almost 4,000 people in Chicago have been killed. We have to bring back law and order. Now, whether or not in a place like Chicago you do stop and frisk, which worked very well, Mayor Giuliani is here, worked very well in New York. It brought the crime rate way down. But you take the gun away from criminals that shouldn’t be having it. We have gangs roaming the street. And in many cases, they’re illegally here, illegal immigrants. And they have guns. And they shoot people
we have to be very vigilant. We have to be—we have to know what we’re doing. Right now, our police, in many cases, are afraid to do anything
We have to protect our inner cities, because African-American communities are being decimated by crime, decimated
These are people that are bad people that shouldn’t be—when you have 3,000 shootings in Chicago from January 1st, when you have 4,000 people killed in Chicago by guns, from the beginning of the presidency of Barack Obama, his hometown, you have to have stop-and-frisk
when you have 3,000 shootings in Chicago from January 1st, when you have 4,000 people killed in Chicago by guns, from the beginning of the presidency of Barack Obama, his hometown, you have to have stop-and-frisk
Stop-and-frisk was found to be unconstitutional and, in part, because it was ineffective. It did not do what it needed to do
I believe strongly that commonsense gun safety measures would assist us. Right now—and this is something Donald has supported, along with the gun lobby—right now, we’ve got too many military-style weapons on the streets. In a lot of places, our police are outgunned
I believe strongly that commonsense gun safety measures would assist us. Right now—and this is something Donald has supported, along with the gun lobby—right now, we’ve got too many military-style weapons on the streets. In a lot of places, our police are outgunned. We need comprehensive background checks
In a lot of places, our police are outgunned. We need comprehensive background checks, and we need to keep guns out of the hands of those who will do harm
when it comes to policing, since it can have literally fatal consequences, I have said, in my first budget, we would put money into that budget to help us deal with implicit bias by retraining a lot of our police officers
in my first budget, we would put money into that budget to help us deal with implicit bias by retraining a lot of our police officers. I’ve met with a group of very distinguished, experienced police chiefs a few weeks ago. They admit it’s an issue. They’ve got a lot of concerns. Mental health is one of the biggest concerns, because now police are having to handle a lot of really difficult mental health problems on the street. They want support
in my first budget, we would put money into that budget to help us deal with implicit bias by retraining a lot of our police officers. I’ve met with a group of very distinguished, experienced police chiefs a few weeks ago. They admit it’s an issue. They’ve got a lot of concerns. Mental health is one of the biggest concerns, because now police are having to handle a lot of really difficult mental health problems on the street. They want support, they want more training
in my first budget, we would put money into that budget to help us deal with implicit bias by retraining a lot of our police officers. I’ve met with a group of very distinguished, experienced police chiefs a few weeks ago. They admit it’s an issue. They’ve got a lot of concerns. Mental health is one of the biggest concerns, because now police are having to handle a lot of really difficult mental health problems on the street. They want support, they want more training, they want more assistance
Mental health is one of the biggest concerns, because now police are having to handle a lot of really difficult mental health problems on the street
we went from 2,200 to 500. And it was continued on by Mayor Bloomberg. And it was terminated by current mayor. But stop-and-frisk had a tremendous impact on the safety of New York City
stop-and-frisk had a tremendous impact on the safety of New York City. Tremendous beyond belief
it is important that we learn about what has been effective. And not go to things that sound good that really did not have the kind of impact that we would want
no one should disagree about respecting the rights of young men who live in those neighborhoods. And so we need to do a better job of working, again, with the communities, faith communities, business communities, as well as the police to try to deal with this problem
Donald started his career back in 1973 being sued by the Justice Department for racial discrimination because he would not rent apartments in one of his developments to African-Americans, and he made sure that the people who worked for him understood that was the policy. He actually was sued twice by the Justice Department. So he has a long record of engaging in racist behavior
he made sure that the people who worked for him understood that was the policy. He actually was sued twice by the Justice Department. So he has a long record of engaging in racist behavior
He actually was sued twice by the Justice Department. So he has a long record of engaging in racist behavior
I think cyber security, cyber warfare will be one of the biggest challenges facing the next president, because clearly we’re facing at this point two different kinds of adversaries. There are the independent hacking groups that do it mostly for commercial reasons to try to steal information that they then can use to make money. But increasingly, we are seeing cyber attacks coming from states, organs of states. The most recent and troubling of these has been Russia. There’s no doubt now that Russia has used cyber attacks against all kinds of organizations in our country, and I am deeply concerned about this
I was so—I was so shocked when Donald publicly invited Putin to hack into Americans. That is just unacceptable
I was just endorsed—and more are coming next week—it will be over 200 admirals, many of them here—admirals and generals endorsed me to lead this country. That just happened, and many more are coming
That just happened, and many more are coming. And I’m very proud of it. In addition, I was just endorsed by ICE
we have to get very, very tough on cyber and cyber warfare. It is—it is a huge problem
we have to get very, very tough on cyber and cyber warfare. It is—it is a huge problem. I have a son. He’s 10 years old. He has computers. He is so good with these computers, it’s unbelievable. The security aspect of cyber is very, very tough
we are not doing the job we should be doing. But that’s true throughout our whole governmental society. We have so many things that we have to do better
We have so many things that we have to do better, Lester, and certainly cyber is one of them
we should have taken the oil—ISIS would not have been able to form
we should have taken the oil—ISIS would not have been able to form either, because the oil was their primary source of income
I was so proud of law enforcement in New York, in Minnesota, in New Jersey. You know, they responded so quickly, so professionally to the attacks that occurred by Rahami
we may find out more information because he is still alive
we need to be cooperating with Muslim nations and with the American Muslim community. They’re on the front lines. They can provide information to us that we might not get anywhere else
NATO could be obsolete, because—and I was very strong on this, and it was actually covered very accurately in the New York Times, which is unusual for the New York Times, to be honest—but I said, they do not focus on terror
I think we have to get NATO to go into the Middle East with us, in addition to surrounding nations, and we have to knock the hell out of ISIS
I think we have to get NATO to go into the Middle East with us, in addition to surrounding nations, and we have to knock the hell out of ISIS, and we have to do it fast
I was against the war. He said, you used to have fights with me, because Sean was in favor of the war. And I understand that side, also, not very much, because we should have never been there. But nobody called Sean Hannity. And then they did an article in a major magazine, shortly after the war started. I think in ’04. But they did an article which had me totally against the war in Iraq
his cavalier attitude about nuclear weapons is so deeply troubling. That is the number-one threat we face in the world
a man who can be provoked by a tweet should not have his fingers anywhere near the nuclear codes, as far as I think anyone with any sense about this should be concerned
Just to go down the list, we defend Japan, we defend Germany, we defend South Korea, we defend Saudi Arabia, we defend countries. They do not pay us. But they should be paying us, because we are providing tremendous service and we’re losing a fortune. That’s why we’re losing—we’re losing—we lose on everything
They do not pay us. But they should be paying us, because we are providing tremendous service and we’re losing a fortune. That’s why we’re losing—we’re losing—we lose on everything
they should be paying us, because we are providing tremendous service and we’re losing a fortune. That’s why we’re losing—we’re losing—we lose on everything
Gemist (50)
we have to build an economy that works for everyone, not just those at the top. That means we need new jobs, good jobs, with rising incomes. I want us to invest in you
I want us to invest in your future. That means jobs in infrastructure, in advanced manufacturing, innovation and technology, clean, renewable energy, and small business
That means jobs in infrastructure, in advanced manufacturing, innovation and technology, clean, renewable energy, and small business, because most of the new jobs will come from small business
I also want to see more companies do profit-sharing. If you help create the profits, you should be able to share in them, not just the executives at the top
we have to stop our jobs from being stolen from us. We have to stop our companies from leaving the United States and, with it, firing all of their people
I think that trade is an important issue. Of course, we are 5 percent of the world’s population; we have to trade with the other 95 percent. And we need to have smart, fair trade deals
we have to trade with the other 95 percent. And we need to have smart, fair trade deals
They should have been doing this for years. What’s happened to our jobs and our country and our economy generally is—look, we owe $20 trillion. We cannot do it any longer
we owe $20 trillion. We cannot do it any longer
Nine million people—nine million people lost their jobs. Five million people lost their homes. And $13 trillion in family wealth was wiped out. Now, we have come back from that abyss
Five million people lost their homes. And $13 trillion in family wealth was wiped out. Now, we have come back from that abyss
$13 trillion in family wealth was wiped out. Now, we have come back from that abyss
it has not been easy. So we’re now on the precipice of having a potentially much better economy, but the last thing we need to do is to go back to the policies that failed us in the first place
The biggest one, a multinational one known as CAFTA, I voted against. And because I hold the same standards as I look at all of these trade deals
that is just not accurate. I was against it once it was finally negotiated and the terms were laid out
You called it the gold standard of trade deals
you live in your own reality, but that is not the facts
that is not the facts. The facts are—I did say I hoped it would be a good deal
new jobs with rising incomes, investments, not in more tax cuts that would add $5 trillion to the debt
when I look at what you have proposed, you have what is called now the Trump loophole, because it would so advantage you and the business you do
Typical politician. All talk, no action
Typical politician. All talk, no action. Sounds good, doesn’t work. Never going to happen
I will release my tax returns—against my lawyer’s wishes—when she releases her 33,000 e-mails that have been deleted. As soon as she releases them, I will release
That was more than a mistake. That was done purposely
I built an unbelievable company. Some of the greatest assets anywhere in the world, real estate assets anywhere in the world, beyond the United States, in Europe, lots of different places
we also have to recognize, in addition to the challenges that we face with policing, there are so many good, brave police officers who equally want reform. So we have to bring communities together in order to begin working on that as a mutual goal
So we have to do two things, as I said. We have to restore trust. We have to work with the police
So we have to do two things, as I said. We have to restore trust. We have to work with the police. We have to make sure they respect the communities and the communities respect them. And we have to tackle the plague of gun violence
We have to work with the police. We have to make sure they respect the communities and the communities respect them
We cannot just say law and order. We have to say—we have to come forward with a plan that is going to divert people from the criminal justice system
deal with mandatory minimum sentences, which have put too many people away for too long for doing too little
I think implicit bias is a problem for everyone, not just police. I think, unfortunately, too many of us in our great country jump to conclusions about each other
I agree with you. When a person is on a watch list or a no-fly list, and I have the endorsement of the NRA, which I’m very proud of. These are very, very good people, and they’re protecting the Second Amendment. But I think we have to look very strongly at no-fly lists and watch lists
I do want to bring up the fact that you were the one that brought up the words super-predator about young black youth. And that’s a term that I think was a—it’s—it’s been horribly met, as you know. I think you’ve apologized for it. But I think it was a terrible thing to say
I was the one that got him to produce the birth certificate. And I think I did a good job
I say nothing. I say nothing, because I was able to get him to produce it
the birther lie was a very hurtful one. You know, Barack Obama is a man of great dignity
the birther lie was a very hurtful one. You know, Barack Obama is a man of great dignity. And I could tell how much it bothered him and annoyed him that this was being touted and used against him
I got to watch in preparing for this some of your debates against Barack Obama. You treated him with terrible disrespect
You were after him, you were trying to—you even sent out or your campaign sent out pictures of him in a certain garb, very famous pictures
I agree to parts of what Secretary Clinton said. We should be better than anybody else
I think there are a number of issues that we should be addressing. I have put forth a plan to defeat ISIS
I think there are a number of issues that we should be addressing. I have put forth a plan to defeat ISIS. It does involve going after them online. I think we need to do much more with our tech companies to prevent ISIS and their operatives from being able to use the Internet to radicalize, even direct people in our country and Europe and elsewhere
I think there are a number of issues that we should be addressing. I have put forth a plan to defeat ISIS. It does involve going after them online. I think we need to do much more with our tech companies to prevent ISIS and their operatives from being able to use the Internet to radicalize, even direct people in our country and Europe and elsewhere. But we also have to intensify our air strikes against ISIS and eventually support our Arab and Kurdish partners to be able to actually take out ISIS in Raqqa, end their claim of being a Caliphate
we have to make this the top priority. And I would also do everything possible to take out their leadership
I would also do everything possible to take out their leadership. I was involved in a number of efforts to take out Al Qaida leadership when I was secretary of state, including, of course, taking out bin Laden
I also have a much better temperament than she has, you know? [laughter] I have a much better—she spent—let me tell you—she spent hundreds of millions of dollars on an advertising—you know, they get Madison Avenue into a room, they put names—oh, temperament, let’s go after—I think my strongest asset, maybe by far, is my temperament
I also have a much better temperament than she has, you know? [laughter] I have a much better—she spent—let me tell you—she spent hundreds of millions of dollars on an advertising—you know, they get Madison Avenue into a room, they put names—oh, temperament, let’s go after—I think my strongest asset, maybe by far, is my temperament. I have a winning temperament
I have a winning temperament. I know how to win
All I said was, they may have to defend themselves or they have to help us out. We’re a country that owes $20 trillion. They have to help us out
Onterecht herkend als argument (fout-positief) (27)
Let me give you the example of Mexico. They have a VAT tax. We’re on a different system. When we sell into Mexico, there’s a tax. When they sell in—automatic, 16 percent, approximately. When they sell into us, there’s no tax. It’s a defective agreement. It’s been defective for a long time, many years, but the politicians haven’t done anything about it.
The NAFTA agreement is defective. Just because of the tax and many other reasons, but just because of the fact…
Independent experts have looked at what I’ve proposed and looked at what Donald’s proposed, and basically they’ve said this, that if his tax plan, which would blow up the debt by over $5 trillion and would in some instances disadvantage middle-class families compared to the wealthy, were to go into effect, we would lose 3.5 million jobs and maybe have another recession.
Donald thinks that climate change is a hoax perpetrated by the Chinese. I think it’s real.
You can’t do what you’re looking to do with $20 trillion in debt. The Obama administration, from the time they’ve come in, is over 230 years’ worth of debt, and he’s topped it. He’s doubled it in a course of almost eight years, seven-and-a-half years, to be semi- exact.
So I will tell you this. We have to do a much better job at keeping our jobs. And we have to do a much better job at giving companies incentives to build new companies or to expand, because they’re not doing it. And all you have to do is look at Michigan and look at Ohio and look at all of these places where so many of their jobs and their companies are just leaving, they’re gone.
Incomes went up for everybody. Manufacturing jobs went up also in the 1990s, if we’re actually going to look at the facts.
You are going to approve one of the biggest tax cuts in history. You are going to approve one of the biggest tax increases in history.
I’m going to cut taxes big league, and you’re going to raise taxes big league, end of story.
Our country is suffering because people like Secretary Clinton have made such bad decisions in terms of our jobs and in terms of what’s going on. Now, look, we have the worst revival of an economy since the Great Depression. And believe me: We’re in a bubble right now. And the only thing that looks good is the stock market, but if you raise interest rates even a little bit, that’s going to come crashing down. We are in a big, fat, ugly bubble. And we better be awfully careful. And we have a Fed that’s doing political things. This Janet Yellen of the Fed. The Fed is doing political—by keeping the interest rates at this level. And believe me: The day Obama goes off, and he leaves, and goes out to the golf course for the rest of his life to play golf, when they raise interest rates, you’re going to see some very bad things happen, because the Fed is not doing their job. The Fed is being more political than Secretary Clinton.
When we have a country that’s doing so badly, that’s being ripped off by every single country in the world, it’s the kind of thinking that our country needs, because everybody—Lester, we have a trade deficit with all of the countries that we do business with, of almost $800 billion a year. You know what that is? That means, who’s negotiating these trade deals? We have people that are political hacks negotiating our trade deals.
When you have your staff taking the Fifth Amendment, taking the Fifth so they’re not prosecuted, when you have the man that set up the illegal server taking the Fifth, I think it’s disgraceful. And believe me, this country thinks it’s—really thinks it’s disgraceful, also.
As far as my tax returns, you don’t learn that much from tax returns. That I can tell you. You learn a lot from financial disclosure. And you should go down and take a look at that.
The other thing, I’m extremely underleveraged. The report that said $650—which, by the way, a lot of friends of mine that know my business say, boy, that’s really not a lot of money. It’s not a lot of money relative to what I had. The buildings that were in question, they said in the same report, which was—actually, it wasn’t even a bad story, to be honest with you, but the buildings are worth $3.9 billion. And the $650 isn’t even on that. But it’s not $650. It’s much less than that. But I could give you a list of banks, I would—if that would help you, I would give you a list of banks. These are very fine institutions, very fine banks. I could do that very quickly. I am very underleveraged. I have a great company. I have a tremendous income. And the reason I say that is not in a braggadocios way. It’s because it’s about time that this country had somebody running it that has an idea about money.
We’ve just seen those two tragic examples in both Tulsa and Charlotte.
Now, I believe in community policing. And, in fact, violent crime is one-half of what it was in 1991. Property crime is down 40 percent.
Too many young African-American and Latino men ended up in jail for nonviolent offenses. And it’s just a fact that if you’re a young African-American man and you do the same thing as a young white man, you are more likely to be arrested, charged, convicted, and incarcerated.
You shouldn’t have a profit motivation to fill prison cells with young Americans.
If you’re too dangerous to fly, you are too dangerous to buy a gun.
But it can’t be dismissed that easily. He has really started his political activity based on this racist lie that our first black president was not an American citizen. There was absolutely no evidence for it, but he persisted, he persisted year after year, because some of his supporters, people that he was trying to bring into his fold, apparently believed it or wanted to believe it.
We need to make it very clear—whether it’s Russia, China, Iran or anybody else—the United States has much greater capacity. And we are not going to sit idly by and permit state actors to go after our information, our private-sector information or our public-sector information. And we’re going to have to make it clear that we don’t want to use the kinds of tools that we have. We don’t want to engage in a different kind of warfare. But we will defend the citizens of this country. And the Russians need to understand that. I think they’ve been treating it as almost a probing, how far would we go, how much would we do.
I don’t think anybody knows it was Russia that broke into the DNC. She’s saying Russia, Russia, Russia, but I don’t—maybe it was. I mean, it could be Russia, but it could also be China. It could also be lots of other people. It also could be somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds, OK? You don’t know who broke in to DNC.
But what did we learn with DNC? We learned that Bernie Sanders was taken advantage of by your people, by Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Look what happened to her. But Bernie Sanders was taken advantage of. That’s what we learned.
Now, whether that was Russia, whether that was China, whether it was another country, we don’t know, because the truth is, under President Obama we’ve lost control of things that we used to have control over.
Number one, the 28 countries of NATO, many of them aren’t paying their fair share. Number two—and that bothers me, because we should be asking—we’re defending them, and they should at least be paying us what they’re supposed to be paying by treaty and contract.
And I think that’s great. And I think we should get—because we pay approximately 73 percent of the cost of NATO. It’s a lot of money to protect other people.
The single greatest problem the world has is nuclear armament, nuclear weapons, not global warming, like you think and your—your president thinks. Nuclear is the single greatest threat.
Drogreden-tags: voorbeelden
Correct (15)
stolen
stealing
Donald, I know you live in your own reality, but that is not the facts.
Typical politician. All talk, no action.
disgraceful
the King of Debt
the plague of gun violence
the whole racist birther lie
this racist lie
he has a long record of engaging in racist behavior.
the birther lie
a total mess
I also have a much better temperament than she has
you were totally out of control
his cavalier attitude
Gemist (16)
I want us to invest in you. I want us to invest in your future.
tremendously
a beautiful thing to watch
trumped-up trickle-down
trumped-up trickle-down
disaster
ripped off
mess
an unbelievable company
a tremendous impact
Tremendous beyond belief.
a tremendously successful club
another one of her disasters
beauty
choking
it was actually covered very accurately in the New York Times, which is unusual for the New York Times
Onterecht toegekend (3)
We have to bring back law and order.
In a place like Chicago, where thousands of people have been killed, thousands over the last number of years, in fact, almost 4,000 have been killed since Barack Obama became president, over—almost 4,000 people in Chicago have been killed.
have said that Donald is unfit to be the commander- in-chief.
Beperkingen van de referentiedataset
Haddadan et al. (2018) hebben honderden minuten aan presidentiële debatten met de hand doorgelabeld op claims, premissen en hun onderlinge relaties, precies dat handwerk maakt onafhankelijke validatie tegen een externe bron zoals hier pas mogelijk.
Niet elke score-afwijking hierboven is dan ook een fout van onze pipeline. Twee voorbeelden uit de "Onterecht herkend als argument"-lijst:
- Ontbrekende annotatie.
"The NAFTA agreement is defective. Just because of the tax and many other reasons, but just because of the fact…"
(Trump) is evident een standpunt met onderbouwing, maar de dataset heeft hier geen Claim-Premise-paar met een Support-relatie geannoteerd. Onze extractie vindt het argument dus terecht; de referentiedataset mist hier zelf een annotatie. - Te korte/inconsistente spangrenzen. Dezelfde stop-and-frisk-uitspraak van Trump staat in de dataset met twee verschillende spangrenzen: eenmaal mét de aanloop over dalende criminaliteitscijfers, eenmaal alleen het sluitstuk
"stop-and-frisk had a tremendous impact on the safety of New York City. Tremendous beyond belief"
. Losstaand, zonder die voorafgaande cijfers, leest die korte versie niet overtuigend als de gelabelde "Appeal to Emotion", eerder als een kale bewering. Zo'n te kort afgesneden span is voor mens én model moeilijk eenduidig te classificeren.
Dat zijn precies de grensgevallen die je verwacht bij handmatige annotatie op deze schaal, ziedocs/eval-elecdebate.md voor de volledige toelichting.